by maryadkins Sat Sep 12, 2015 5:20 pm
Kind of tricky! I see what you mean.
Well, okay, this guy doesn't think "in a surprise development" should be used when the surprise was the journalist's, or when the surprise was someone else's, or when it was lots of people's. That doesn't leave many if any circumstances in which he thinks it SHOULD be used.
(A) isn't what he thinks. He doesn't say when it should be used.
(B) brings in if something is interesting which isn't what he says, either.
(C) isn't his point. It may be true but it's not his conclusion.
(D) Summing up? No
(E) BINGO. The only one that fits.