jenndg100380
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 18
Joined: August 03rd, 2010
 
 
 

Q10 - Editorial: Many observers note

by jenndg100380 Sun Nov 21, 2010 5:28 pm

I was down to (B) and (D) and ended up choosing (B). Could someone please give me an example of a counterexample so I can see the difference between that and alternative explanation? I ended up choosing (B) because I thought (D) was too strong. After all the editorial does say that the causal argument may not be true.

Thanks.
User avatar
 
noah
Thanks Received: 1192
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: February 11th, 2009
 
This post thanked 3 times.
 
 

Re: Q10 - Editorial: Many observers note

by noah Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:35 pm

This is an interesting question. The editorial is undermining this argument: people volunteer less because the government is providing those services.

The counter argument is that it may actually be that the government is providing those services because people volunteer less.

This is pointing out that the direction of causation could be reversed. That's an alternate explanation, as (D) notes. This isn't a very strong answer choice - an "alternate explanation" is relevant to something that "may" be the real relationship.

(A) is incorrect because the Editorial does suggest a possible causation.

(B) is tempting, but a counterexample to the correlation would be something like "In Riverdale, there are fewer volunteers, but the government has not stepped in at all, in fact the government is providing fewer services!"

Furthermore, (B) suggests that the Editorial gives a counterexample to the correlation, but the Editorial is undermining a certain direction of causation.

(C) is too broad (and thus out of scope).

(E) is off topic - there's no suggestion that governments MUST do anything.

Does that clear it up?

P.S. I added the first few words of the question - please do that going forward, it makes it easier for future users to find the question they're looking for. Thanks.
 
griffin.811
Thanks Received: 43
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 127
Joined: September 09th, 2012
 
 
 

Re: Q10 - Editorial: Many observers note

by griffin.811 Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:04 pm

Like the OP I too had this down to B and D, ultimately siding with B more so because I thought D was wrong than anything.

based on Noah's explanation, am I correct in saying that B is incorrect because there isn't ANY example provided at all? Rather just an explanation?
User avatar
 
noah
Thanks Received: 1192
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: February 11th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q10 - Editorial: Many observers note

by noah Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:52 pm

griffin.811 Wrote:Like the OP I too had this down to B and D, ultimately siding with B more so because I thought D was wrong than anything.

based on Noah's explanation, am I correct in saying that B is incorrect because there isn't ANY example provided at all? Rather just an explanation?

Yes - and I went up and cleaned up my explanation a bit to point out another issue with (B).