I think I (C) why (C) is tempting (
). It made me do a double-take certainly. Yet there are two problems with this answer choice.
The word "might." The word "might" is so vague and even kind of useless that it is hard to have this be in the correct answer for a flaw. Coffee drinkers
might do this....Coffee drinkers
might do that. So? Coffee drinkers
might do
anything! Coffee drinkers might stab themselves in the eye with their coffee spoon. Can we claim that coffee is dangerous from this? No. The point of the argument is to
weaken the claim by finding the
flaw. This isn't a true weaken question but it definitely is not your typical flaw question either. I hope this makes sense. "Might" does not really do anything to weaken the claim. What if we had this argument...
Having oatmeal every morning will lower cholesterol
→
Thus, having oatmeal is healthy
Which one of the following points to a weakness in the reasoning in the press release's argument? (A) Oatmeal might make you eat a lot more foods that are really high in cholesterol and it might make you eat 84 Big Macs in one sitting.
Does this point to a weakness in the claim? Absolutely not. Just because someone
might do something doesn't mean it
will happen. It may even mean that there is almost no chance of it happening! It would be much different if the answer choice said "Oatmeal
will make you eat 84 Big Macs in one sitting." (Although this would never be a correct answer choice - we have to assume a bunch of stuff for this to work including that Big Macs are high enough in cholesterol, etc.)
However, let's say we
don't have the word "might." Let's say the answer choice says, "Coffee drinkers will choose to eat, along with their coffee, foods containing substances that harm the heart."
Coffee drinker → foods containing substances that harm the heart → heart is harmed
Now of course we still have the big gap from harming/not harming the heart to safety. Let's ignore that for a second and get to another point in logic. This answer choice is still saying that, it is not the coffee that harms the heart, it is the food! Thus, I think it would be rationale to still have this answer choice be wrong because the
coffee is not what is harms the heart, the
coffee just induces an effect that in turn harms the heart.