
The last part of the third paragraph is mainly concerned with arguing for positive aspects of today's bankruptcy laws designed to ensure stable economy and creditors' benefit.
Let's go through incorrect answers, first.
A) This is way too strong and extreme in my opinion. I thought this sounded a bit threatening. We were focusing on the benefits of today's bankruptcy law, so focusing on "inadequacy" of it sounds unrelated to the flow as well.
C) "criminal law"? Where did that come from?
D) "Future bankruptcy law?" No prospect on the law has been hinted anywhere.
E) This contrast is not supported from the passage. Also, we don't have any lead from the previous portion to focus on creditor vs. debtor contrast with regard to today's vs. antiquated bankruptcy law.
Now, for B), I am guessing there is a connection with the word "goal" because "the ultimate goal" has been mentioned in line 57. And, the first sentence of the paragraph starts with mentioning "shortcomings of the punitive approach." Is this why it's rather "valid", or okay, to talk about the punishment with rather FIRM tone? I just thought it was pretty strong of a sentence when you change a direction of the flow. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
P.S. Does anybody have a hard time typing "bankruptcy?" because you have to move your forefinger from T to C to Y? I kept on misspelling..
