User avatar
 
WaltGrace1983
Thanks Received: 207
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 837
Joined: March 30th, 2013
 
 
trophy
Most Thanked
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Passage Discussion

by WaltGrace1983 Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:09 pm

I swear the only thing worse than a science passage is a science passage that is heavy into very specific, confusing detail.s

Paragraph 1: Bacteria find their way to stuff they need; how?!
    - This is a pretty simple beginning. We are given a phenomena and then scientists ask how this can occur.


Paragraph 2: One clue = specific patterns of swimming correlated with attractants/harmful substances
    - Bacteria swim to the stuff they like
    - Moving towards good stuff = less tumbling = straighter
    - Moving away from good stuff = more tumbling = less straight

    * Note: Most of this paragraph is heavily reliant on cause and effect relationships. "This will probably be asked in some inference question" may be what you are thinking here.


Paragraph 3: Two possible ways this occurs = front/back theory or interval theory

    * Note: I broke this paragraph into two paragraphs, splitting at 45. So now I have the first paragraph that discusses the two theories and the second paragraph that gives more information about the two theories. It just seemed easier for me to keep track of the information.


Paragraph 3.5: Expectations if one theory over another is valid
    - If interval theory + exposed to uniformly high concentration → straight runs
    - If front/back theory + exposed to uniformly high concentration → no response
    - Evidence suggests interval theory


Once again, in paragraph 3(.5), we see a bunch of conditional relationships! We are probably going to be asked questions about this. So I think the difficulty of this passage remains in the insane amount of cause-and-effect, interpreting all of this cause and effect under timed pressure will be (was) fairly difficult.
 
LeonC641
Thanks Received: 0
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 33
Joined: May 20th, 2018
 
 
 

Re: Passage Discussion

by LeonC641 Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:40 am

Hi Manhatten Prep,

I have a problem with understanding a clause in Line 30 -32, quoted "...,whereas runs aways from it are shortened by an increased tendency of the bacteria to tumble and change direction."

My understanding regarding the entire second paragraph is the same as the above post, but the quote-unquote seems, to me, contradictory with the understanding!

Based on the clause, when the tumbling tendency increases, then bacteria will less likely to run away from the "good stuff", given "runs aways from it are shortened ".
I just can't figure out this clause! Any helps, please!?

Thanks!