Just a quick question that I have about RC.
More and more I spend time on RC, more and more I realize how accurate to describe RC as a puzzle game:
Every answer you look for is in the passage. All you've got to do is go back and check your answer.
At first I was like... Psh.... I knew that... but I didn't. And now, I do.
Now, having said that, questions that ask you for a broad concept especially questions like "which are the following things that the author most agrees with," or "the passage most strongly implies that..." these give me a headache!
They don't give you any kinds of boundary... it's like here go fetch a ball but I am not telling you where it is.
Someone once told me that if I ever go back to the passage, it means that I didn't really "read" it. Of course, you have to go back for those specific line reference number questions.
I realize that if you go back to passage every time when you tackle a question, there is no way you would get any incorrect answers... it's just that you do it at the expense of time constraint.
My real question is: does anyone actually refer back to passage every time when you tackle a question (inference questions especially) like mentioned above and still be able to solve through all four passages?
Or can someone give me advice on how to tackle inference questions?