Eliminate, eliminate, eliminate - but maybe not scope??

by **SouljaS293** Fri Sep 10, 2021 5:35 am

Trying to incorporate the Manhattan RC method in my prep, but I'm a bit confused by its application. Eliminating out of scope answers often seems easy enough, but at other points I find myself eliminating answers that I THINK are out of scope, but are actually supported by a detail somewhere along the passage that I forgot.https://19216801.onl/ https://routerlogin.uno/

For example, for question 27 in PT 57. I forgot that fractal "didnt have a precise definition established", so I quickly eliminated that choice because I was like what the hell are they talking about? Turns out, that was the right answer.

Technically I should have been able to eliminate the answer I picked (E) since "significant number of mathematicians" isn't really talked about anywhere - however, that being said, should one just tend to avoid eliminating out of scope answers initially? Or is that just the risk that comes with the approach?

Thanks!