I hope I have not posted this before, or have not responded to someone who posted this before. If the former or latter, but not both, is the case, then I only apologize for the former if it is indeed the case.
This brings me to my question. It has to do with how to diagram "either/or + not both" conditions.
I get that "X or Y" is diagrammed as not Y -> X and
"not both X and Y" is diagrammed as X -> not Y
Therefore, X or Y but not both is diagrammed as X <-> not Y
But what about, If X then Y or Z but not both?
Does this translate to: X -> Y <-> not Z
Not sure that makes sense to me, or even if it does, how do I get the contrapositive of that statement? Maybe I'm missing something.
It makes more sense (still makes my head hurt) to write it out like this:
X -> YorZ and not(YandZ)
X -> YorZ and (notY or notZ)
Or
X -> YorZ
X-> notY or NotZ
Contra:
notY and notZ -> notX
Y and Z -> notX
Thoughts??
Note: This was a crucial condition in SuperPrep-B Game 2. Check it out.