LSAT Forum
2 postsPage 1 of 1
-
- bbirdwell
-
Thanks Received: 864
-
Atticus Finch
- Posts: 803
- Joined: April 16th, 2009
- This post thanked 1 time.
Re: Diagram
Just like it looks!
Then, using the constraints, make inferences. The constraint that says "2 of the North lights must be on" is a great one. At that point, I'm thinking, "well, there's only three ways to do that."
Then I noticed the constraint that says "1 --> ~2 & ~7" and I see that 1 and 2 can never be on together.
This means that there are only two ways to do it: either 1 and 3 are on, or 2 and 3 are on. From there, I make inferences within these two "frames" and the game is mine.
Attached is a sketch of the two frames I used and an overview of how I made the inferences.
Then, using the constraints, make inferences. The constraint that says "2 of the North lights must be on" is a great one. At that point, I'm thinking, "well, there's only three ways to do that."
Then I noticed the constraint that says "1 --> ~2 & ~7" and I see that 1 and 2 can never be on together.
This means that there are only two ways to do it: either 1 and 3 are on, or 2 and 3 are on. From there, I make inferences within these two "frames" and the game is mine.
Attached is a sketch of the two frames I used and an overview of how I made the inferences.
- Attachments
-
- PT8, G2-Parking Lot Lights - ManhattanLSAT.pdf
- (57.48 KiB) Downloaded 478 times
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm
2 posts Page 1 of 1