h.b.
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: June 16th, 2009
 
 
 

PT34, S4, G4 - Each of Exactly Six Doctors

by h.b. Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:00 pm

Hi,

Can someone please post the set up for this game? It was done during the study hall and I missed most of it due to bad connection...

Thanks!
 
aileenann
Thanks Received: 227
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 300
Joined: March 10th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: E34S4G4 Each of Exactly Six Doctors

by aileenann Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:21 pm

Here's what we came up with in our studyhall -- a very strange game! Take a look and see how it works for you. It's definitely a tight chain.

Tell me what you think.
Attachments
PT34, S4, G4 - Two Clinics - ManhattanLSAT.pdf
(57.07 KiB) Downloaded 1515 times
 
nazu.s.shaikh
Thanks Received: 0
Elle Woods
Elle Woods
 
Posts: 53
Joined: April 27th, 2010
 
 
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: PT34, S4, G4 - Each of Exactly Six Doctors

by nazu.s.shaikh Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:00 pm

Question,( Thank you for the diagram btw, very helpful!) If O is at S then P should be at R .. right? So then for Q19 how can both P and O be at S together?

Also for 23.... J and K cannot both be at R.One has to be at the other (S) so why is A incorrect?
 
dan
Thanks Received: 155
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 202
Joined: March 10th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: PT34, S4, G4 - Each of Exactly Six Doctors

by dan Sun Aug 15, 2010 4:06 pm

Be careful that you don't read the arrows backwards. The arrow goes from P(r) to O(s), not the other way around. The PDF diagram above is a bit hard to read, so maybe you misread it as a double-sided arrow?

For #23, J and K CAN both be at R. Again, be careful not to read the arrows backwards. It's true that they can't be at S, but they can both be at R.

Hope that helps!
 
rachael.swetnam
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 6
Joined: November 30th, 2010
 
 
 

Re: PT34, S4, G4 - Each of Exactly Six Doctors

by rachael.swetnam Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:57 pm

I could use some help understanding #22 and #19.
thanks so much.
 
mturner
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 15
Joined: November 28th, 2010
 
 
 

Re: PT34, S4, G4 - Each of Exactly Six Doctors

by mturner Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:30 pm

Rachel,
It took me quite a while to figure out # 19 as well and I got # 22 correct by dumb luck ( I have diagrammed my rules wrong). Anyway, after redoing my diagram and spending close to an hour on the questions, I figured them out.

# 19: Looking at the rules, if O is in S, then N must be in S. That eliminates answers A and C. N and P can't be in R together, but nothing keeps them from being in S together. So, right now we have at least O, N, and P. So, now we have eliminated answer D and E leaving answer B. However, I saw in the rules that if J is in S, then K is not and I don't see K in answer B.

Kind of a round about answer, but I was able to get it right.
Now for question # 22: I set up two charts placing N and O in both columns. When I placed O is column S, then by the rules N had to be in S as well. So, the only diagram that would work is N being in S and O being in R. Then, if you look at the rules, if O is in R, then J must be in S--answer A.
User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT1
Thanks Received: 1909
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: PT34, S4, G4 - Each of Exactly Six Doctors

by ManhattanPrepLSAT1 Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:08 pm

Nice work mturner...

Let me just add another way of looking at Q19. This is an orientation question. Simply take the constraints and knock out the incorrect answers one by one. Compare each constraint against the answer choices.

To see the process...

(A) violates the 1st constraint
(B) is correct by the process of elimination
(C) violates the 4th constraint
(D) violates the 5th constraint
(E) violates the 2nd constraint

For Q22 take a look at the following frames that can be established based on establishing one frame where J is at Souderton and one frame where J is at Randsborough. I would have these frames established before I even started on the first question.



And let me know if you still have questions on this game...
Attachments
PT34, S4, G4 - Souderton and Randsborough - ManhattanLSAT.pdf
(42.34 KiB) Downloaded 521 times
 
peg_city
Thanks Received: 3
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 152
Joined: January 31st, 2011
Location: Winnipeg
 
 
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: Diagram

by peg_city Tue May 03, 2011 5:57 pm

How do you approach 21? Can you still use the diagram presented?

Thanks
 
nborges
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 2
Joined: December 11th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Diagram

by nborges Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:18 pm

Hello,

I am also interested in the best approach to figuring out question 21.

Thanks!
 
kylelitfin
Thanks Received: 16
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 18
Joined: August 20th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Diagram

by kylelitfin Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:09 pm

nborges Wrote:Hello,

I am also interested in the best approach to figuring out question 21.

Thanks!


Question 21 should actually be really quick. If you don't already have a really strong set of chains made a quick glance at the rules show that condition 5 can potentially cause the most issues with getting a low number of doctors in S.

Pr -> Ks + Os
Or or Kr -> Ps

Well obviously we don't want to throw 2 doctors into S right off the bat, so we're going to use the contrapositive as our starting point creating this:

Moreover, even if you did go with Pr -> Ks + Os, you're going to force the contrapositive of 4, Os -> Ns and all of the sudden there are 3 doctors in S without even looking at the other rules.

S --> P
R --> O, K

From here, just go through the conditions in order:

Condition 2 contrapositive: Or -> Js

S --> P, J
R --> O, K

Condition 3 contrapositive: Ns or Ps -> Lr

S --> P, J
R --> O, K, L, N

Done. 2.