by ohthatpatrick Mon Sep 09, 2013 3:00 pm
Let me preempt my response by saying that when you dive into the world of Causality/Explanations, you're going to see tons of similarity and tons of variety. The similarity comes from the fact pattern of the arguments themselves:
1. correlation between X and Y --> X causes Y
or
2. X happened --> Y is the explanation
(note: no correlation in the Explanation fact pattern)
I didn't fully understand your question because you said you feel like these are the same question but then you mentioned the differences. How are they the same?
I wouldn't call these two questions the same, except for the fact that they're both in the world of Causality/Explanations.
In the world of
correlation between X and Y --> X causes Y
====
Correct answers either
1. deal with reverse causality
2. deal with an alternate cause
3. deal with adding more evidence/counterevidence that X and Y go hand-in-hand
In the world of
X happened --> Y is the explanation
===
Correct answers either
1. deal with an alternate explanation
2. attack/bolster the credibility of the provided explanation
So Test 48 Q9 is from the correlation --> causality world and the correct answer (A) is doing #2, providing an alternate cause (Oh, it's not the VITAMINS that are helping, it's the other ingredients in foods that contain these vitamins)
Test 19 Q4 is from the Explanation world and the correct answer (D) is doing #2, attacking the credibility of the provided explanation (if ferrous material promoted a great increase in diatoms, then how come we don't see more diatom shells during that period?)
Let me know if this clears things up or if you have follow-ups.