brandonhsi
Thanks Received: 0
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 29
Joined: March 08th, 2013
 
 
 

Conditional logic - "only"

by brandonhsi Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:59 pm

I am having a hard time to translate the following statements (1. and 2.) with a word "only" into "A guarantee B" (A --> B). I found myself taking too long to decipher 1. and 2. I could decipher 3. quickly because I do it mechanically (as long as I see "only if" then it follows a necessary condition), which might not be a good thing?

1. The only people who water ski are those who can swim.

2. Only the good dies young.

3. Any statement with "only if"

Could someone help me with a good/common sense way to decipher them, so I can decipher them quickly in the exam?

Thanks!
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
This post thanked 2 times.
 
 

Re: Conditional logic - "only"

by tommywallach Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:25 am

Hey Brandon,

I would just practice (using, for example, our LSAT Arcade) until all of these comes as naturally as the third one does. As for deciphering...that's a tough word to use. Because, technically, they are already written in standard, simple English.

1. The only people who water ski are those who can swim.

So...we know that if somebody water skis, they must swim, because nobody else waterskis. In notation:

WS --> S

2. Only the good die young.

This is the same as the one above, but it's been switched around. You could rewrite it as: The only people who die young are the good.

In notation: DY --> G

3. Steve will come to the party only if Samantha comes.

Logically, if Steve is at the party, we know Samantha must be there, because we were told that Steve's being there required Samantha's being there.

In notation: St --> Sa

I can't tell if I helped or not, because I'm not really doing much in the way of translation...but let me know if that cleared things up!

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image