by tommywallach Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:14 am
Hey Rosemary,
Well I don't know anything about Powerscore, but what I can tell you is that I'm nervous about anything that simplistic. If a passage says that A causes B, that ABSOLUTELY does not imply that A is the only thing that causes B. I doubt Powerscore put it that simply, but if they did, they're wrong.
However, it could also be that you're explaining it slightly wrong. Causation issues typically do not have any actual causation described in the stimulus. That's because causation creates correlation, so there's no error to be pointed out (i.e. if smoking causes heart disease, then there is logically (and irrefutably) a correlation between smoking and heart disease). A typical passage will give you correlation, then attempt to conclude causation. If a passage creates correlation, the error is that the author is missing anything else that might be causing the correlation (as you described, some third thing C, or else it's B causing A rather than A causing B).
Make sense?
-t