ptraye
Thanks Received: 5
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 103
Joined: February 01st, 2012
 
 
 

2320

by ptraye Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:14 pm

The RU method expresses the biological value of various proteins as a percent of the biological value of egg protein, and biological value is a measure of protein absorption.

We can infer that...

A) The RU method cannot rank any protein higher than egg protein.

B) The RU method assigns a biological value of 100 to egg protein.

------------------------------------

I got this wrong. B is correct. I understand why it is, but why is A wrong?

If egg protein is 100%, how can anything be ranked higher than it?

Thanks.
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: 2320

by tommywallach Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:07 pm

Hey Ptraye,

Things can be higher than 100%. Egg protein is simply being used as a base value, so that other things can be compared to it. If something is absorbed better/more efficiently, it could have an RU of 150, or 1500!

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image
 
kenyamlee
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 8
Joined: March 20th, 2014
 
 
 

Re: 2320

by kenyamlee Sat Nov 22, 2014 4:29 pm

Hi,

Can anyone give a more in depth explanation of how to arrive at the answer?

Is there some way to diagram it?
Or explain why A is wrong?
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: 2320

by tommywallach Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:54 pm

It's an inference question, so there is no core/outline.

I explained why (A) is wrong already. There's no reason to believe that 100 is the maximum something can be. Other proteins could have MORE protein than the egg protein (which is what this measurement uses as a benchmark).

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image