by sumukh09 Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:38 pm
Hi,
The answers were discussing the differences between the two types of judging systems and not the differences in the types of sports. We can infer what B is saying here because there is a potential for bias in judging competitive figure skating, and a potential for bias makes a system less fair than one in which this potential is reduced. We don't really need the stimulus to discuss the differences in the two sports - it's essentially irrelevant for the purposes of this question. Our focus should be on the fairness of the two judging systems and how reducing the chances of of bias in one system makes it a fairer system than the other.
For more on why B is correct, competitive figure skating, using its current system, does not require the highest and lowest scores to be discarded. This means that a judge might show bias if they give a particular figure skater a score of 6, or if they give a score of 1 since both those scores are extremes in the scoring scale; either the figure skater would really have to suck to earn a 1 or be really awesome to earn a 6. However, to be sure that there are no other - unwarranted - reasons for giving a particular figure skater a 1 or 6, discarding any judge's score who gave a 1 or 6 would help reduce the possibility that there was a bias in their evaluation. Thus, competitive figure skating, without this system in place, has a greater possibility of bias than competitive diving, which currently uses this system of discarding the highest and lowest scores.