charleneroche
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 11
Joined: May 26th, 2013
 
 
 

Q9 - Student representative: Our university

by charleneroche Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:58 pm

i know the dean misconstrued the student rep. argument which is answer c but i also think the dean had a misleading argument (fallacious) because he stated by endorsing verbal harassment it will threaten free ideas which is not necessarily true. Help!
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q9 - Student representative: Our university

by tommywallach Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:33 pm

Hey Charlene,

So, I'm a little confused about what your issue is. Try to be as clear as possible with your descriptions; it'll help us to help you!

I'm going to assume you're saying that you were tempted (or ended up choosing) answer choice (B). But you can't simply isolate the word fallacious: obviously the Dean has a fallacious argument (the very question posed here tells you that). The problem with (B) is that the dean does not provide a "fallacious distinction between speech and other sorts of behavior." Everything here is about speech, from verbal harassment to the free flow of ideas. Nothing is compared to "other sorts of behavior."

Hope that helps!

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image