Hi,
I have been trying to understand unsuccesfully a question that appeared on the verbal section in the Practice Test 3.
This is the question:
Although the woman never refused a dinner invitation from a man who was not ______ , she made an exception in Adam’s case, because he was too agreeable, even for her.
a) contentious
b) complacent
c) altruistic
d) conscientious
e) sympathetic
The answer is A, but I do not fully understand why. I have been discussing this question with some friends and they think that she did not go out with Adam, because he was too agreeable for her (they are interpreting 'agreeable' as someone who says yes to everything). On the other hand, I think that she liked men who were not nice, as long as they were not violent ('contentious'). But she did go out with Adam, because he was too nice.
So, can anyone please tell me what do you interpret from this question?
If this is not the right forum to place this question, I am sorry. I tried to look for any previous discussion regarding this question, but did not find anything.
Thanks.