*Please note that these forums are no longer active.*
For questions about Manhattan Prep’s GRE courses and products, please contact our Student Services team at gre@manhattanprep.com. If you believe you’ve found a misprint in our materials, please visit our Errata page.
The documentary is made to look like it's never been seen.
To imitate or counterfeit would be to make an illegal copy of something. But the movie isn't made to seem like an illegal copy; it's made to seem like nobody's ever seen it before. The thing that would keep people from seeing it wouldn't be an illegal copy, but it being KEPT from people (i.e. suppressed or censored).
you know what confuses me - I thought that the documentary had never been seen before and that it even if it had been seen, it wasn't the original but rather the counterfeited version.
And also does the first clause: 'It may be that..' act as some sort of pivot or clue or is it just empty verbiage that doesn't add to the idea in the text?
It's definitely a confusing sentence. I wouldn't say the opener is a pivot, however, because it's saying "maybe," which is exactly in the middle (neither agreeing nor disagreeing with something else). So we don't know if it showed or not. What we DO know is that it's made to look like it has not been shown.