by kiyer71 Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:16 pm
I have question for the reading comprehension ( my weak point). The questions that ask undermine, always confuse me. Particuarly question number 135 on Page 238, number 135 on chapter 5. From the question I think of it as which ones contradict or weaken the statement about opposing naturalism. I initially thought the answer was 1, because in the passage it says "...embracing artifice over nature in writing.." , which I took it as though literature was not a method since writing was not something that was a focus. When I look at the answer, it says it's all three and the reasoning makes me think it is asking which ones SUPPORt the claim/statement. Could someone break this down for me please! Sorry if my question may not have made sense I can clear it up if needed.