Hello TommyWallace,
Thank you for showing another alternative to solving this problem. It seems to be an even longer process. It to me a minute to understand where you were headed, but I caught on.
Is it possible to explain this problem using the solution provided in the answer section (page 71) of the book?
I think what is keeping me from understanding the breakdown provided in the guide is that I am not seeing how 12 and 7 came to be used as bases, or the premise as to why it was solved the way it is in the book.
Thank you for replying.
tommywallach Wrote:Hey Pn,
You can't really use pythagoras here. To do so you'd have to do the following: Set the unknown dotted length in the bottom right corner as y.
Now solve for the WHOLE right triangle, with height x and (7+y):
x^2 + (7+y)^2 = 144
49 + 14y + y^2 + x^2 = 144
NOW, use pythagoras to solve within the triangle:
3^2 + z^2 = 7^2
9 + z^2 = 49
z^2 = 40
z = rt. 40 = 2rt.10
That means the base of the other right triangle is (12 - 2rt. 10), so we can use pythagoras again:
3 ^2 + (12 - 2rt.10)^2 = w^2
You could then TECHNICALLY solve for w. Once you have w, you can write the equation for the final right triangle (made up of two dotted lines) as x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = w ^ 2.
From there, you can replace the x^2 + y^2 in the FIRST equation we came up with (At the top of this post), and solve for y, then x.
Phew! Don't do it!
-t