Errata – Number Properties, 2nd Edition


Cover for 2nd Edition

2.0

Page Location Description Erroneous Text Correction
36 Bottom x divisibility check (graphics swapped) 6 ÷ 12 (etc.) 6 ÷ 3 (etc.) {as shown on p. 38}
38 Middle x divisibility check (graphics swapped) 6 ÷ 3 (etc.) 6 ÷ 12 (etc.) {as shown on p. 36}
52 Top #14 accuracy of math language If a/b has a remainder of 4, If a has a remainder of 4 when divided by b,
61 Top The Sum of Two Primes example, Choice [A] b is an even number ab is an even number
62 Middle #6 If x/y is even, If x and y are integers and x/y is even,
62 Middle #7 If xyz is even, x, y, and z are integers.  If xyz is even,
68 Middle #17 explanation for Quantity A neglects to divide by 4 before checking the tenths digit. …by 4. The tenths digit will always have a zero in it (ie. 4.0, 8.0, 12.0). …by 4, and the integer that results after dividing by 4 will always have a zero as the tenths digit (i.e. 4/4 = 1.0, 8/4 = 2.0, 12/4 = 3.0).
95 Top #4 explanation x can be 0 or 1. x can be 0, -1, or 1.
95 Top #4 explanation If x = 1, our second equation… If x = -1 or 1, our second equation…
95 Top #4 explanation …so x = 1. …so x = 1 or -1.
105 Top Factoring example: sqrt(360) sqrt(2 × 2) × sqrt(3 × 3) –> sqrt(2 × 5) sqrt(2 × 2) × sqrt(3 × 3) × sqrt(2 × 5)
149 Bottom Set 1, Drill 6.  27 is not prime Prime numbers: 2, 3, 5, 7, 17, 27, 29, 31 Prime numbers: 2, 3, 5, 7, 17, 29, 31
149 Bottom Set 1, Drill 6.  27 is not prime {omission between 21 and 33} {insert} 27 (digits add to 9),
149 Bottom Set 1, Drill 6.  27 is not prime Again, all 5 numbers are divisibile by 3. Again, all 6 numbers are divisibile by 3.
170 Middle #9 solution assumes that x is an integer, but the question doesn’t specify. (If x could be a non-integer, the answer would be 204 instead of 256.) …greater than 50, then what is the smallest possible value for x2? …greater than 50 and x is a positive integer, then what is the smallest possible value for x2?
177 Middle #6 …splitting 81 + 169 into sqrt(81 + 169 is incorrect, …splitting sqrt(81 + 169) into sqrt(81) + sqrt(169) is incorrect,