by ChrisB Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:38 pm
Hi Shrikant,
Good question - I don't want you to look at this as a preposition question, which is what "to" vs. "for" is. Instead, think of this as infinitive vs. preposition phrase that is made up of a preposition + a gerund. In general the infinitive, or "to enhance" in your example, is used to show intent regarding another action in the sentence.
For example, "I answered your question to help you understand to vs. for." In this case, "to help..." provides the intent associated with "I answered" and answers why I helped you.
Rephrased to take out the intent, "I hope my answer helped with understanding this topic."
In addition to intent, the infinitive is used to show reasoning. Here's an example, "I am happy to help you understand this issue."
Finally, let's get to your example:
Like F.A. Hayek, Sowell views the concern for social justice as nothing more than a pretext to enhance/for enhancing government power at the expense of individual freedom.
Think about what information "to enhance" or "for enhancing" conveys. Specifically how does "to enhance" or "for enhancing" relate to the major action? First we must identify the major action, which is "views." Does "to enhance government power..." answer why "Sowell views the concern..." this way? No it doesn't, so we should use "pretext for enhancing."
I hope this helps and in the future question whether the object provides reason or intent. If it does, the infinitive is required. If not, the infinitive is not appropriate.
Thanks!
Chris
Chris Brusznicki
MGMAT Instructor
Chicago, IL