no. you can only use 'comma + __ing' if the __ing part is inseparable from whatever is described in the main clause.
e.g.,
Joseph was struck by a cab, dying instantly.
this sentence CORRECTLY uses 'comma __ing'.
notice that, in this context, it's impossible to separate 'joseph was struck' and 'joseph died'—in other words, it's impossible to conceive of either of them independently of the other—because they are two aspects of exactly the same event.
*Joseph was struck by a cab, dying in the hospital an hour later.
this sentence is INCORRECT, because these are two separate events.
"concluding xxxx" and "recommending yyyy" are certainly not inseparable, so 'comma __ing' can't be used here.
Given this, does "thereby" operate similarly to the correct usage of the participle described above i.e., if it refers to the same action/event? Building on Ron's example from above, can we say, "Joseph was struck by a cab, thereby dying instantly."
GMAC clearly does not think "something remains thus even when" is an awkward construction, since that appears as one of the correct answer choices somewhere in their OG. So, they expect us to have some sense of these useless lawyer words. Thanks.