Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
manhhiep2509
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:20 pm
 

the use of to + verb

by manhhiep2509 Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:14 pm

Hi.

(1) "John moved to the city to find job"
(2) "The house is too small to be bought by the big family.
(3) "The house is too old for Ann to live in"

I see that "to find job" and "to be bought" refer to the subject of (1) and (2) , but "to live in" does not refer to the subject of (3) but "Ann".

Is there any rule about which noun in the sentence the phrase "to + verb" refer to?

Or do I have to figure out which noun the phrase refer to through the meaning of the sentence?

Thank you.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: the use of to + verb

by RonPurewal Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:23 am

manhhiep2509 Wrote:Hi.

(1) "John moved to the city to find job"
(2) "The house is too small to be bought by the big family.
(3) "The house is too old for Ann to live in"



In some instances, "to + verb" can describe a noun. E.g., Scientists are looking for new ways to cure cancer --> "to cure cancer" describes "ways".

In most instances, though -- including your first two examples above -- "to + verb" describes the entire clause (subject + action) before it. It's not accurate to say that "to + verb" just describes the subject, since it's not an actual attribute of the subject; it's the purpose of the action.

In any case, you'll have to use common sense to tell what is being described.
This should not be news, of course. Even in the case of modifiers that only work in one way, you still need to use common sense to tell whether the modifier is being used correctly. (E.g., if "which" follows a noun, you still have to check whether it's the right noun.)