Math problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: The numbers x and y are not integers. The value of x

by jnelson0612 Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:23 pm

supratim7 Wrote:Whoa.. I all along thought "6.5 results when x is rounded to nearest tenth" rephrase is "6.45 ≤ x < 6.55"

Thank you Joe :)

Supratim


Glad that you were helped! :-)
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
supratim7
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: The numbers x and y are not integers. The value of x

by supratim7 Wed May 08, 2013 11:01 am

jlucero Wrote:
supratim7 Wrote:
RonPurewal Wrote:here's an example:

what number results if the number x is rounded to the nearest hundred?
(1) the multiple of 20 that is closest to x is 140.
(2) x is within ten units of 140.

here, statement (1) means that 130 < x < 150. that's a strict inequality, which doesn't apply to 130 and 150 themselves (since 130 is just as close to 120 as to 140, and 150 is just as close to 160 as to 140).
all of these numbers give 100 when rounded to the nearest hundred, so this statement is sufficient.

So, you mean, as far as the term "rounding" is concerned in GMAT, no ≤ & ≥ are involved, only strict < & > are applicable.

So, "6.5 results when x is rounded to nearest tenth"
Rephrase "6.45 ≤ x < 6.55" INCORRECT
Rephrase "6.45 < x < 6.55" CORRECT
Am I right??

Many thanks | Supratim

Supratim,

That's correct. The GMAT isn't trying to trick you with their language. They're trying to be very explicit and won't choose numbers where your understanding of how to round (traditional vs banking) changes the answer. As Ron pointed out, the original question doesn't even use the words rounding or estimating: "The value of x is closest to which integer"


Hi Joe, you confirmed that as far as the term "rounding" is concerned in GMAT, no ≤ & ≥ are involved, only strict < & > are applicable. But in this (viewtopic.php?f=30&t=4311&view=next) post I see Ron using ≤ & ≥.

I understand that "closest, etc." refers to "< & >" but my question was about "rounding". What am I supposed to infer when the term "rounding" is used??

Many thanks | Supratim
jlucero
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:33 am
 

Re: The numbers x and y are not integers. The value of x

by jlucero Thu May 09, 2013 2:57 pm

supratim7 Wrote:Hi Joe, you confirmed that as far as the term "rounding" is concerned in GMAT, no ≤ & ≥ are involved, only strict < & > are applicable. But in this (viewtopic.php?f=30&t=4311&view=next) post I see Ron using ≤ & ≥.

I understand that "closest, etc." refers to "< & >" but my question was about "rounding". What am I supposed to infer when the term "rounding" is used??

Many thanks | Supratim


I would say to assume that the GMAT isn't out to trap you with which type of rounding you are using, but from that GMAT Prep question, I guess you can safely assume that 0.4550 rounds up to 0.46, otherwise the answer would be E. Great point, supratim.
Joe Lucero
Manhattan GMAT Instructor