hi -
this problem has caused a great deal of anguish. for the record, it is probably a bit too complicated for the gmat; i don't think that the gmat will test things like speed relative to ground vs. speed relative to a moving frame of reference.
*** My question: In the first part of the explanation we subtract 3 ft from Bills combined rate of movement of 6 ft/sec because we are measuring just "Bills movement." Thus we get a speed of 3 feet per second for the first 240 feet because 6-3=3
imagine placing one still camera on the ground ("ground camera"), and placing another on the belt ("belt camera").
in the first part, the
ground camera would record bill as moving 6 ft/sec, while the
belt camera would record him as moving 3 ft/sec.
In the second part Bill is standing still with the group while the walkway is moving 3 feet per second. So why do we say that Bill covered the remaining 60 feet at 3 feet per second if we are just measuring Bills movement?
in the second part, the
ground camera would record bill as moving 3 ft/sec, while the
belt camera would record him as moving 0 ft/sec.
does that help?