Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
rustom.hakimiyan
Course Students
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:03 am
 

That Clause vs. Direct

by rustom.hakimiyan Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:43 pm

Hi,

I'm a little confused on the usage of "that". Just when I think that I understand the usage, I get a question where the logic goes out the window. I have a few examples below that might help clairfy my question.

So from what I know -- a "that" is followed by a clause. But in certain situations, I don't understand why we skip the "that" part and go directly to the intended meaning.

Example 1:

1) Persuade Jon to do the dishes. (Correct)
2) Persuade that Jon do the dishes.

Example 2:

1) Confidence that the economy will avoid(Correct)
2) Confidence in the economy to avoid

Example 3:

1) Company requires that the employees be screened...(Correct)
2) Company requires the employees to be screened...

Example 4:

1) Believed people to be great(correct)
2) Believed that people are great

Thanks!
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: That Clause vs. Direct

by RonPurewal Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:07 am

Only #2 has anything to do with idiomatic usage.

You can resolve #1 by just thinking, literally, about the very basics of the sentence—the verb and the object.
Whom are you persuading?
You're persuading Jon.
OK.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: That Clause vs. Direct

by RonPurewal Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:08 am

rustom.hakimiyan Wrote:Example 3:

1) Company requires that the employees be screened...(Correct)
2) Company requires the employees to be screened...


Both versions in #3 are fine. They mean slightly different things, but the difference is way too slight to be dispositive in an official GMAT problem. (If a GMAC problem turns on a meaning difference, it will be a BIG difference.)
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: That Clause vs. Direct

by RonPurewal Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:08 am

rustom.hakimiyan Wrote:Example 4:

1) Believed people to be great(correct)
2) Believed that people are great

Thanks!



Both versions in #4 can work, too. Absent a specific context, it's impossible to pick one or the other.

In actual usage, you're very unlikely to see "believed to be..." as anything other than a modifier.

E.g.,
Snakes, believed to be demons by many primitive peoples, ...
This kind of thing is decently common.

On the other hand, you pretty much won't see something like Many primitive peoples believed snakes to be demons. It's not wrong; it's just weird. Decent writers would write ...believed that snakes were demons instead.
rustom.hakimiyan
Course Students
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:03 am
 

Re: That Clause vs. Direct

by rustom.hakimiyan Sat Sep 13, 2014 5:38 pm

Thanks, Ron. I'll try to keep my eyes peeled for this. Maybe the idiomatic structure of #2 was throwing the rest off for me.

Thanks.
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: That Clause vs. Direct

by tim Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:34 pm

:)
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html