Source : Critical Reasoning, Manhattan Guide 6, Chapter 1, Page 27
Argument:
Tay Sachs disease, a usually fatal genetic condition caused by the build-up of gangliocides in nerve cells, occurs more frequently among Ashkenazi Jews than among the general population.
The age of onset is typically six months and generally results in the death by the age of four
--------------------------------
Per the book (Manhattan) says that there is no conclusion at all. It marks sentence 1 & sentence 2 as premises both
Could i categorize the argument in the following manner instead :
1) Can the pink specifically be regarded as a conclusion ?
Conclusion : Tay Sachs results in the death by the age of four
Premise for this conclusion : the green ...the green supports the conclusion (age of onset is 6 months only)
2) Is the blue really a premise or just background information ?
Reason : A premise should support the conclusion specifically ...Here there is no conclusion or if there is a conclusion (assume pink)
The blue doesn't really support the pink in any way -- the blue seems irrelevant for the pink and thus, background information