Stymieing the Armada’s plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma’s army off the coast of Flanders, the reason for the defeat of the Spanish Armada was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrificing of eight war ships as "fire ships," vessels filled with flammable materials and sent downwind toward the closely-anchored Spanish fleet.
A)Stymieing the Armada’s plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma’s army off the coast of Flanders, the reason for the defeat of the Spanish Armada was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrificing
B)The defeat of the Spanish Armada, which stymied the Armada’s plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma’s army off the coast of Flanders, was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrifice
C)The defeat of the Spanish Armada, which stymied the Armada’s plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma’s army off the coast of Flanders, was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrificing
D)Stymieing the Armada’s plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma’s army off the coast of Flanders, the reason for the defeat of the Spanish Armada was not only gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrificing
E)Stymieing the Armada’s plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma’s army off the coast of Flanders, the defeat of the Spanish Armada was due not only to gale winds that favored the British but also to the sacrifice
I received this question in my MGMAT CAT:
I'm trying to figure out why C is wrong? Isn't "gale winds" parallel to "the sacrificing of" since the latter is a complex gerund?
The thing I do see wrong with it(as I was trying to dissect this statement) is that not only X(due to gale winds)...but also (this is missing "due to"?) Is that correct?
Lastly, for E -- "to gale winds" vs. "to the sacrifice". I thought that the "the" in "the sacrifice" ruined parallelism because it made the latter an infinitive. Why am I wrong? It seems as though the "the" always throws me off.
OA is E.
Thanks!