The Use of Past Perfect "had not previously considered" should require another past action - probably stimulated - rather than has stimulated (present perfect) I have seen certain answer choices explained as wrong just on the basis of using past perfect along with present perfect rather th...

The New Image HAS (Singular) not Have - so we can eliminate A & B I think WHICH can refer to far off noun as well - in this case tools so we need include not includes - eliminate C & D We are left with E. Is there a rule that which can refer to far off nouns (not the preceding noun after the...

Here the correct Ans uses Present Perfect "HAVE Made"

We need present perfect to refer to "Actions which happened at an indefinite (unknown) time before now"

Is my logic correct ???

Understanding the meaning is Important I hope. Researchers in Germany have taken out wooden spears FROM - what appears as lakeshore hunting site. Now this discovery shows something ---- which sentence goes on to explain further. Now the elimination part A - It has no antecedent - its better to say t...

Is the usage "When Compared" Unidiomatic.

Regards

In my opinion, we should see the original sentence and only if it is wrong then find the correct one. Now this sentence clearly says: Though her career was cut short and recordings were disappointingly --- and ----, -------- This sentence is parallel and grammatically correct. Now there is no issue ...

Is the usage more ---- Rather than -- unidiomatic. I have always seem More --- Than If more ---Rather than is unidiomatic then we can easily eliminate A &E B& D can be eliminated as comparison is wrong. In B & D - FOR has to be repeated to get the correct meaning. Now A presents the corr...

One more comparison is presented in the problem. A - Its (Dollar's) weight is far less the four quarters -- Dollar weight wrongly compared to four quarters. B & C - it (Dollar) weighs only 8.1 grams, far less than four quarters - Correct comparison between Dollar and four quarters D & E - it...

Is the below true: There are some hard fast rules for If and Then If (Past Tenses) - Then (Past or Would Verb) If (Present) - Then (Present/Future Tenses) If (Past Perfect) - Then Would Have No other use of if and then apart from above. Now here we can come down to D&E - as we need something to ...

Would C have been correct if: by using acoustical signals, not BY using olfactory ones, and by attracting Reason: X (by using acoustical signals) NOT Y (BY using olfactory ones), and Z (by attracting) -- X, NOT Y, and Z - Parallel Would E have been correct if: using acoustical signals, not USING olf...

I think even if we use parallel structures as below, meaning conveyed is not correct. 1. using acoustical signals, not BY using olfactory ones, and by attracting 2. using acoustical signals, not USING olfactory ones, and attracting It changes the meaning: whistling moths of Numbing, Australia, call ...