Verbal questions from any Manhattan Prep GMAT Computer Adaptive Test. Topic subject should be the first few words of your question.
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: SC: Supporters of tax breaks that local governments award

by jnelson0612 Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:46 pm

dwijiitm Wrote:Why has E been eliminated?..

Is there any grammatical error in E? or did it get eliminated because it is wordy?.


E uses the idiomatic error "consider X to be Y". The correct usage of the idiom is "consider X Y".

For example, the sentence "I consider you to be smart" is incorrect. "I consider you smart" is correct.
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
FRANCISCOR57
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 4:45 pm
 

Re: Pronoun Antecedents: Using the structure of the sentence.

by FRANCISCOR57 Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:44 pm

esledge Wrote:The antecedent of "them" is clearly enough "businesses," despite the presence of many plural nouns (supporters, tax breaks, governments, and businesses). The structure of the sentence is a big part of the reason.

The correct answer is (D):
Supporters consider tax breaks (that local governments award businesses (each year) (to prevent them from moving)) vital economic development tools while critics denounce the tax breaks as corporate welfare that helps some localities but weakens the national economy.

In bold, you see the main core of the sentence: Supporters consider tax breaks vital economic development tools.

In parentheses, you see modifiers. There is a relative clause modifying "tax breaks." Within that relative clause, there are two adverbial modifiers of "award": "each year" (how often the governments award), and "to prevent them from moving" (why the governments award). Notice that "them" is buried in a modifier within a modifier, far removed from the main sentence subject "supporters" or even the modified noun "tax breaks." For clarity, such a pronoun is more likely to have an antecedent within the same modifier.

But that still leaves "governments" or "businesses" as possible antecedents. If "governments" were the intended antecedent, the phrase would have to read "local governments award businesses...to prevent themselves from moving." The reflexive pronoun "themselves" would be necessary because "governments" is the subject of the verb "award" whereas the pronoun is the object of the verb "prevent." Think of the simple example "I hit the tennis ball to myself."

Both "businesses" and "them" are objects of their respective verbs, so that similarity links them together. Plus, "businesses" is both the most logical and the closest antecedent.

There are two main things going on in this question:
(1) The idiom "X considers Y Z" (incorrectly given in some choices as "X considers Y to be Z")
(2) The repetition (or not) of "them."

On the GMAT, if you use a particular pronoun more than once, it must refer to the same antecedent every time. Thus, (A) and (C), which both use "them" first to refer to "businesses," then later to refer to "tax breaks," are incorrect.






Hello,

how could we apply the same principle to the following?

"The fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity THEY generate more expensive"

(The sentence above is part of the correct answer choice on one official question)

From the context, it is obvious that "THEY" refers to the nuclear plants, however, I believe this is not enough reason to go with this answer choice.

Would you say that "THEY" could be referring to costs rather than plants?

Could you please shed some light on this?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Pronoun Antecedents: Using the structure of the sentence.

by RonPurewal Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:39 am

FRANCISCOR57 Wrote:From the context, it is obvious that "THEY" refers to the nuclear plants, however, I believe this is not enough reason to go with this answer choice.


If the referent of a pronoun is obvious, then, yes, it's "good enough".

Also, I'm confused by this post in general. You don't need "reasons to go with" the correct answer. Instead, you need "reasons" to eliminate the other answers.