Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
poonamchiK
Students
 
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:16 am
 

SC Question

by poonamchiK Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:56 pm

According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly, largely because of the burning of fossil fuels, that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century.

b. should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison
c. should the present rate of buildup be continued, the global concentration of this poison
d. the global concentration of this poison, were the present rate of buildup continue
e. that the global concentration of this poison, if the present rate of buildup did continue.

What do u think is the answer?

I thought it was (b)
Bt the correct ans is a.
poonamchik@gmail.com
abhishek.pitti
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:46 pm
 

Re: SC Question

by abhishek.pitti Sun Mar 21, 2010 1:01 am

Good Question!!

I was stumped when i first read it but the more I read it, I realized that it seems like you do need a that before comma as the text after 'that' reflect the prediction by the experts....

I am not positive about the usage of 'should' but I am not sure if you can create a subordinate clause which if you donot have 'that', it will modify the global concentration and will seem like we are starting a new statement after comma.

Rewriting the sentence to make my point:

According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century.

'Largely because of the burning of fossil fuels' is modifying 'carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly' but i donno what category of modifier does it fall into.

Hope this helps.

-Abhi
pawan_chitturu
Students
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:52 am
 

Re: SC Question

by pawan_chitturu Tue Mar 23, 2010 12:46 pm

the question can be simplified to:
so "X" that "Y"
therefore we can eliminate b, c & d

between "A" and "E"; "A" is much precise while "E" is ackward

experts can explain much better
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: SC Question

by Ben Ku Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:09 pm

Please cite the source (author) of this problem. We cannot reply unless a source is cited (and, if no source is cited, we will have to delete the post!). Thanks.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT