Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
herogmat
Students
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:19 am
 

SC: astronomers working at telescopes

by herogmat Sat Dec 05, 2009 6:03 am

Sentence 1:
An international team of astronomers working at telescopes in the Canary Islands and Spain has detected at least 18 huge gas spheres estimated to have 5 to 15 times the mass of Jupiter, the solar system’s largest planet.

Sentence 2 :
An international team of astronomers, working at telescopes in the Canary Islands and Spain ,has detected at least 18 huge gas spheres estimated to have 5 to 15 times the mass of Jupiter, the solar system’s largest planet.

Is there any difference in the meaning of the sentences ?
Last edited by herogmat on Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
sanyalpritish
Students
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:36 pm
 

Re: SC: astronomers working at telescopes

by sanyalpritish Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:06 am

I dnt see any new appos., in the 2nd questions, in the 2nd question there are commas, wats ur question
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: SC: astronomers working at telescopes

by RonPurewal Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:27 am

herogmat Wrote:Sentence 1:
An international team of astronomers working at telescopes in the Canary Islands and Spain has detected at least 18 huge gas spheres estimated to have 5 to 15 times the mass of Jupiter, the solar system’s largest planet.

Sentence 2 :
An international team of astronomers, working at telescopes in the Canary Islands and Spain ,has detected at least 18 huge gas spheres estimated to have 5 to 15 times the mass of Jupiter, the solar system’s largest planet.

Is there any difference in the meaning of the sentences ?


there's a rhetorical difference, although certainly way too small of a difference to be relevant to the gmat.

-- THE BELOW EXPLANATION IS WAY, WAY BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE GMAT --

in (a), "working at telescopes in the X" is an essential modifier. this means that the astronomers are not considered just as astronomers, but rather as "astronomers working at telescopes in the X". in other words, the act of working at telescopes in the X is considered part of the identity of these astronomers; they basically can't leave these telescopes without losing their identity.

in (b), they are just "astronomers", and they happen to be working at telescopes in location X (nonessential modifier --> disposable this time). if they were to get up and move to other telescopes, their identity would not suffer as a result.