Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
zaarathelab
Students
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:59 pm
 

Richard Feynman

by zaarathelab Sun Aug 07, 2011 4:15 am

The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for undergraduate students in a two-year course.

A. The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for
undergraduate students in a two-year course.
B. For undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a two-year course, being a comprehensive
introduction to modern physics.
C. A comprehensive introduction was in a two-year course by the physicist Richard Feynman presenting to
undergraduate students an introduction to modern physics.
D. Presenting a comprehensive introduction, the physicist Richard Feynman introduced modern physics in a two-year
course designed for undergraduate students.
E. In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a
comprehensive introduction to modern physics.

OA is E
Doesn't E suggest that the richard feynman was contained in a 2 year course?

Shouldn't it be -

In a 2 year course......, a comprehensive introduction to modern physics was presented by Richard Feynman?
dibya.pal
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by dibya.pal Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:57 pm

zaarathelab Wrote:The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for undergraduate students in a two-year course.

A. The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction to modern physics designed for
undergraduate students in a two-year course.
B. For undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a two-year course, being a comprehensive
introduction to modern physics.
C. A comprehensive introduction was in a two-year course by the physicist Richard Feynman presenting to
undergraduate students an introduction to modern physics.
D. Presenting a comprehensive introduction, the physicist Richard Feynman introduced modern physics in a two-year
course designed for undergraduate students.
E. In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students, the physicist Richard Feynman presented a
comprehensive introduction to modern physics.

OA is E
Doesn't E suggest that the richard feynman was contained in a 2 year course?

Shouldn't it be -

In a 2 year course......, a comprehensive introduction to modern physics was presented by Richard Feynman?



Here is the way which always holds in modifier questions...place WHO / WHAT before the modifier....
Op E: WHO In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students...??? ... the physicist Richard
OR
WHAT In a two-year course designed for undergraduate students...??? ....the physicist Richard presented something..---> a clause
Hence i believe that in both the cases the modifier is well placed.

Hope this helps..:)
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by jnelson0612 Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:18 pm

What is the original source of this question?
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
zaarathelab
Students
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:59 pm
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by zaarathelab Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:35 pm

source:gmatprep
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by tim Wed Oct 19, 2011 5:31 pm

The original poster asked whether that first modifier would be modifying Feynman. It would if it were a noun modifier; however, it is not being used as a noun modifier. How do we know? Because it doesn't make sense for it to modify Feynman! :)

Let us know if there are any further questions about this one..
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
tanyatomar
Students
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:44 am
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by tanyatomar Wed May 23, 2012 12:28 pm

Hi,
i did not understand why option A is wrong.

Tanya
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by tim Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:22 am

in A, it's not clear what "in a two-year course" is modifying..
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
sw001
Students
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by sw001 Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:30 pm

Instructors,

Could you please help explain the sentence construction used in option E.

Another q on this -
"In a two year course..." Did physicist created the course.
Or physicist theory was part of the course. What does it imply?

Thanks!
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by tim Sat Oct 04, 2014 11:47 am

Please make sure any questions you ask have question marks at the end and are grammatically correct. Failure to do this will prevent us from being able to help you effectively.
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Richard Feynman

by RonPurewal Sun Oct 05, 2014 10:18 am

Wrong folder for this problem, so the thread is now locked.

* If this problem is from the free GMAT Prep software, please post your question(s) in the GMAT Prep folder.
Also, please post a screenshot of the problem. (It would be VERY surprising if any problem from the free software did not already have a thread on our forum.)

* If this problem is from the paid GMAT Prep question packs, we can't host it here.

Thanks.