Verbal problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
Guest
 
 

Retailers reported moderate gains

by Guest Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:54 pm

Retailers reported moderate gains in their November sales, as much because of their sales of a year earlier being so bad as that shoppers were getting a head start on buying their holiday gifts.

A. of their sales of a year earlier being so bad as that
B. of their sales a year earlier having been as bad as because
C. of their sales a year earlier being as bad as because
D. their sales a year earlier had been so bad as because
E. their sales of a year earlier were as bad as that

Is it ok to use past perfect when it is already mentioned "a year earlier", which shows something is done before in time? Can anyone explain it? Thanks in advance.
esledge
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1181
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:33 am
Location: St. Louis, MO
 

Please post question source

by esledge Sun Nov 02, 2008 2:34 pm

Please cite the source (author) of this problem. We cannot reply until then. If no source is cited, we will have to delete the question just to be sure we are not violating someone else's copyright. Thanks!
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
Kiran
 
 

by Kiran Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:07 am

This is a GMATPrep question. I reached this post while searching for explanation for OA answers on GMATPrep parctice test.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by RonPurewal Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:50 am

Guest Wrote:Is it ok to use past perfect when it is already mentioned "a year earlier", which shows something is done before in time? Can anyone explain it? Thanks in advance.


yes.

as long as there's something to serve as the second past time marker - to which the action referenced in the past perfect is relevant - you can use the past perfect.

another example:
at the beginning of the 1991 track season, the world record in the men's long jump had stood for almost 23 years.

the correct answer to this problem is (d).

--

incidentally, you can knock out all of (a), (b), and (c) for the same reason: the disallowed construction "because of NOUN VERBing".
see this post.
easy pickings if you know you can kill that particular structure.
JonathanSchneider
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:40 pm
 

by JonathanSchneider Thu Jan 01, 2009 6:50 pm

:)
montz1
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:12 pm
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by montz1 Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:28 am

I could knock off a,b,c but I was confused between D and E and chose E because there were two 'because' in D which somehow didn't seem right.

D has 'as much because X as because Y'. So, the retailers reported moderate gains in November sales because of two reasons - X and Y. Am I right? But with this the meaning of the sentence is not clear to me.

May be I am not able to understand what the sentence is trying to say. Can you please explain.

Thanks a lot.
devneeetbajaj
Students
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:41 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by devneeetbajaj Wed Dec 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Difference bween D and E is the correct use of past perfect in D, versus simple past in E.
gmatprep14
Students
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:37 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by gmatprep14 Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:37 am

RonPurewal Wrote:incidentally, you can knock out all of (a), (b), and (c) for the same reason: the disallowed construction "because of NOUN VERBing".
see this post.
easy pickings if you know you can kill that particular structure.


Hi Ron

Not able to see the post you have mentioned above ,please post again

i just checked the link; it works.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by RonPurewal Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:34 am

montz1 Wrote:I could knock off a,b,c but I was confused between D and E and chose E because there were two 'because' in D which somehow didn't seem right.


"as much ... as ..." is a parallel structure. therefore, the presence of "because" in both parts signals valid parallelism. it's actually a very good thing.

parallelism is probably the single most common type of error in the entire SC section, so you should probably start there if you don't understand how parallelism works.


D has 'as much because X as because Y'. So, the retailers reported moderate gains in November sales because of two reasons - X and Y. Am I right? But with this the meaning of the sentence is not clear to me.


that's exactly right... so what's not clear to you? it looks like you just gave a nice concise summary of exactly what the sentence means.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by RonPurewal Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:37 am

devneeetbajaj Wrote:Difference bween D and E is the correct use of past perfect in D, versus simple past in E.


that's true, but there are two other problems with (e) that are much easier to discern:
* improper parallelism (as much because X as that Y)
* "as bad as" sets up a comparison, which doesn't have a second half in this case (you can't just say "as bad" by itself; you have to mention ... as bad as what else. by contrast, "so bad" can be used by itself, as it is in the correct answer here; "so ADJ" is not a comparison.)
patil.ambar
Students
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:57 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by patil.ambar Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:31 am

I came across the same structure in OG12 # 83.

(C) a phenomenon occurring not just because of
drugs that are becoming
more expensive but
because of doctors having also written

Can we eliminate this based on because + of + noun + verbing ?
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by RonPurewal Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:26 am

patil.ambar Wrote:I came across the same structure in OG12 # 83.

(C) a phenomenon occurring not just because of
drugs that are becoming
more expensive but
because of doctors having also written

Can we eliminate this based on because + of + noun + verbing ?


that's not actually "of + noun + verbing" -- you're forgetting the "that are" in there -- but, yes, it can be eliminated for very similar reasons.
vijay19839
Students
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:45 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by vijay19839 Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:10 am

Hello MGMAT instructors,

Below is the right option D. Can someone please elaborate on what role
the below highlighted part plays to the original sentence?

Retailers reported moderate gains in their November sales, as much because their sales a year earlier had been so bad as because shoppers were getting a head start on buying their holiday gifts.


Thanks
Vijay
jlucero
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:33 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by jlucero Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:50 pm

The bolded portion is an aside that gives a reason for the main clause (why retailers gained moderate gains in November sales). They use an awkward construction that follows:

Sales in November increased.
Sales in November increased because of X.
Sales in November increased because of X and Y.
Sales in November increased, as much because Y as because X.
Joe Lucero
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
divineacclivity
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:09 am
 

Re: Retailers reported moderate gains

by divineacclivity Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:55 am

"so" in answer choice D sounded off to me.
e.g. I called an off for the day because I was so ill.
"I was so ill" - sounds in complete as if someone would say something like "I was so ill that I couldn't ..."

Please help me understand. thanks in advance.

Infrequent doesn't mean incorrect. Your example is perfectly acceptable as "so" modifies ill. How ill were you? So ill that you called off work.