Students in the metropolitan school district lack math skills to such a large degree as to make it difficult to absorb them into a city economy becoming ever more dependent on information-based industries.
(A) lack math skills to such a large degree as to make it difficult to absorb them into a city economy
becoming
(B) lack math skills to a large enough degree that they will be difficult to absorb into a city's economy that becomes
(C) lack of math skills is so large as to be difficult to absorb them into a city's economy that becomes
(D) are lacking so much in math skills as to be difficult to absorb into a city's economy becoming
(E) are so lacking in math skills that it will be difficult to absorb them into a city economy becoming
Source: OG 11th edition..
This question was discussed earlier, but some points were left unanswered. So I want to ask the question again.
The correct answer here is E. But during my elimination process, I removed E as it contained a pronoun 'it' that didnt refer to anything. So I am confused on how it can be the correct answer. I see explanations that E has the correct idiomatic usage. So if that is the case, does the pronoun error have a lesser priority than idiomatic error? I have also seen few other sentences where pronouns like it and there are used without a clear antecedent, but are still correct.
Please clarify the answer. (I am taking the test in 3 days, any explanation would be appreciated)
Thanks
Vizay