Hello, here is a "data sufficiency" problem that I believe is incorrectly evaluated by ManhattanGMAT
Is x > y?
(1) squareroot(x) > y (read this as "square root of x is greater than y")
(2) cube(x) > y (read this as "x cube is greater than y")
the correct answer as per ManhattanGMAT is "Both (1) and (2) are needed"
I think just (1) is sufficient, because if square root of x is greater than y, than both the positive and negative root of x is greater than y. Since the negative root of x is greater than y, certainly y is negative. Since y is negative and x is positive, x has to be greater than y.
The explanation provided by ManhattanGMAT does not take into consideration the negative root of x. Was that a mistake?