NicoleT643 Wrote:Hi Ron,
I have question about the 'it' of AE
It was mentioned in the previous post that it refers to the ozone. Thus, to say: "it appeared that it was immune" would be unnecessary.
Can't this it be the same function as : "IT APPEARS THAT the dinosaurs WERE smart." ?
Between D and E, why E is inferior thanD?
Thanks
NicoleT643 Wrote:Hi Ron,
I have question about the 'it' of AE
It was mentioned in the previous post that it refers to the ozone. Thus, to say: "it appeared that it was immune" would be unnecessary.
Can't this it be the same function as : "IT APPEARS THAT the dinosaurs WERE smart." ?
RonPurewal Wrote:NicoleT643 Wrote:Hi Ron,
I have question about the 'it' of AE
It was mentioned in the previous post that it refers to the ozone. Thus, to say: "it appeared that it was immune" would be unnecessary.
Can't this it be the same function as : "IT APPEARS THAT the dinosaurs WERE smart." ?
even if you try to interpret the construction this way...
...it's still clearly inferior to the shorter version
...the mixing of 2 different tenses is nonsense ("has appeared" + "was immune").
A and E can both be eliminated for either of these reasons.