Renowned economist Susan Albernaght once stated,
as an illustration of opportunity cost, that a company
that earned a return lower than the interest rate on a
savings account ought to be liquidated and the
proceeds distributed to the shareholders.
that a company that earned a return lower than
the interest rate on a savings account ought
to be
that a company, earning a return lower that
the interest on a savings account, should be
that a company which earned returns lower than
savings account interest rates ought to be
a company that was earning a lower return
than a savings account was
a company earning a return lower than that of
a savings account should be
OA is A. i agree that A is better. Is "A" really following the rules of parallelism and subjunctive mood ?
Note: the question is from Princeton.