by jonathanc Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:34 pm
Had this question as well and it still have not been changed 02/10/2009 ....
This is not the first time with RC (I already met this problem on a text about LCD and did report on it, and one CR have flawed corrections but fortunately well explained by Emily sledge on the forum...) and it is very frustrating when after trying 10 minutes or more correcting alone to finally give up and have to search on the forum to discover that nobody have a better explanation except that there is a mistake in the stem.
It is a pity to still meet mistakes (3 in 3 test till now all in verbal...) that have been reported many times (It would be much more acceptable if it would have been a brand new question but 2007 ....) while the MGMAT test itself is a really GREAT tool (timing, question level, awome quant questions etc...), it just unfairly lower the opinion one can have about it...
I dont mean to complain about it but just hope that can be corrected for the future. Thanks a lot,
John