Math problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
amahajan01
Students
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Of the students who eat in a certain cafeteria, each student

by amahajan01 Mon Jul 25, 2016 1:23 pm

(1)
120 students total
--> 40 YES LIMA, 80 NO LIMA
split up the NO LIMA crowd:
--> 3/5 of 80 = 48 NO LIMA + NO BRUSSELS
--> 2/5 of 80 = 36 NO LIMA + YES BRUSSELS
sufficient

Hi Ron,

Am re-opening the thread as I am still not a 100% sure about the solution. Shouldn't the above read as 3/5 of 80 = 48 no lima + no brussels and 2/5 of 80 = 32 no lima + yes brussels. Let me know if I am missing something here.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Of the students who eat in a certain cafeteria, each student

by RonPurewal Sat Jul 30, 2016 4:34 pm

you are correct; i also went back and fixed that old post. thanks.
FarukhA694
Students
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 7:23 am
 

Re: Of the students who eat in a certain cafeteria, each student

by FarukhA694 Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:08 pm

Hello Ron and Team,

First of all - Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!

I believe there is something which is still missing. This is how I did it:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_mCLX ... sp=sharing

The top table is how I did it and the numbers come out to be 120 for the whole group. However, if we do it while considering it a mutually exclusive set then the numbers don't come out to be 120 for the LBs and BSs. Could you please check.

Kindest Regards,
FA
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Of the students who eat in a certain cafeteria, each student

by RonPurewal Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:22 am

"liking lima beans" and "liking brussels sprouts" are not mutually exclusive.
neither are "disliking lima beans" and "disliking brussels sprouts".

this is just basic common sense -- these are 2 totally different foods -- but, also, the problem statement explicitly says there are people who dislike both.

no, there are not "multiple interpretations".