Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by RonPurewal Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:39 am

mondegreen Wrote:Is it the presence of "for it" that makes B incorrect?

X awarded Y powers to do Z. This makes sense right?


Yeah, I can't immediately come up with a sentence in which the idiomatic construction used in (B) would be correct.


Also, I get a slightly different meaning from B.It reads to me as if the powers were given to CIA making it mandatory to withhold all the information. However, A seems to suggest that the powers made it possible for CIA to withhold information whenever the CIA wanted to.Just a provision, not a mandate.


Exactly. Very well done.

And you know that "whenever the CIA wants to" is the correct interpretation, because the sentence states that the powers are "discretionary".
mondegreen
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:40 pm
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by mondegreen Thu Nov 28, 2013 12:04 pm

: :)

Thanks a lot Ron!
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by RonPurewal Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:32 am

You're welcome.
jhuman lal meena
Students
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:14 pm
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by jhuman lal meena Sun Feb 15, 2015 1:51 am

Ron please help.
In option C, "for withholding" should be "to withhold" to express purpose.
Ex. I have come to study. [Correct].
I have come for studying. [incorrect].

Please confirm.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by RonPurewal Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:58 am

in this context, yes, that's correct.
vishalc581
Students
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:22 am
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by vishalc581 Mon Oct 05, 2015 2:28 am

Hello Ron,

I didn't understand the why option B is wrong here.

(B) for it to withhold from the public

In option A how VERB-ing is right, I mean I have seen (,VERB-ing) as correct choice when we need to show cause-effect for simultaneous actions) but not (VERB-ing without comma before).

Can you please help me.

Thanks & Regards,
Vishal
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by RonPurewal Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:33 am

'no comma +__ing' is a VERY common modifier. you've definitely seen it. you've probably seen it tens or even hundreds of times.

it points to the noun before it. here, that's 'powers', which is exactly what we want to modify (the answer to "What enables xxxxx?" is 'discretionary powers').
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: Multiple Pronoun referents

by RonPurewal Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:34 am

...and i noticed that there's no source given for this problem.

the only place where i can find this problem is in an old OG (a VERY old one—the 11th edition).
OG problems are not allowed here, so, unless this problem is in the FREE gmat prep software (and someone can kindly provide a screenshot as proof), we can't discuss it here.

if this problem is actually in the free software, then it doesn't belong in this folder anyway (in that case it belongs in the gmat prep folder). so, in that case, please post a new thread (with a screenshot) in the appropriate folder.
thanks.