Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
vivekcall81
Students
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:04 am
 

Muhammad’s son-in-law

by vivekcall81 Sun May 02, 2010 10:32 pm

FROM kaplan
In the late seventh century, in a dispute over whether the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, Ali, should carry on as the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor, Islam split into two branches, the Sunnis and the Shiites.
(A) over whether the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, Ali, should carry on as the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor
(B) over if Ali, the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, was going to carry on and be the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor
(C) over whether Ali, the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, was going to carry on and be the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor
(D) as to whether the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor, is to be the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-low, Ali
(E) concerning if the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor, was to be the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, Ali

CAN ANYBODY EXPLAIN WHY C WAS WRONG.
debmalya.dutta
Students
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:51 am
 

Re: Muhammad’s son-in-law

by debmalya.dutta Mon May 03, 2010 12:07 am

Is option A the answer?

"was going to carry on" is the wrong piece in Option C.
hi4apoorva
Students
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:11 am
 

Re: Muhammad’s son-in-law

by hi4apoorva Mon May 03, 2010 5:01 pm

vivekcall81 Wrote:FROM kaplan
In the late seventh century, in a dispute over whether the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, Ali, should carry on as the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor, Islam split into two branches, the Sunnis and the Shiites.
(A) over whether the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, Ali, should carry on as the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor
(B) over if Ali, the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, was going to carry on and be the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor
(C) over whether Ali, the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, was going to carry on and be the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor
(D) as to whether the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor, is to be the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-low, Ali
(E) concerning if the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor, was to be the Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law, Ali

CAN ANYBODY EXPLAIN WHY C WAS WRONG.


Correct Idiom is "Debate Over"--Elliminate D and E
Whether is prefferred over if-when there is a decision.Elliminate -- B

If you treat every SC mechanically and using rules -->There are more than two Modifiers for Ali.
1) "Prophet Muhammad’s son-in-law" ,and "as the fourth caliph, Muhammad’s successor"
To clearly explicate the meaning of the sentence these two modifiers should be on either side of Ali.

2) If you are the logical type,the sentence "C" incorrectly says that Ali is "going to Carry on"..Carry on what ? A correctly says Carry on as the fourth Caliph.


Lastly, Kaplan is banned source--sooner or later the MGMAT staff will have to delete your post,since Kaplan has requested not to discuss Kaplan's questions on MGMAT forum.
vivekcall81
Students
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:04 am
 

Re: Muhammad’s son-in-law

by vivekcall81 Tue May 04, 2010 2:58 am

THANX DEBMULLYA,
i'll keep in mind the thing about Kaplan.