Does the conclusion escape you? Has understanding the tone of the passage gotten you down? Get help here.
namurad
 
 

Modifiers - Problem Set - Manager's attitude

by namurad Wed May 07, 2008 1:12 pm

Q 15 Obstinate and surly, the manager's attitude prevented his staff from befriending him.

The rectified sentence as given in the answers is - "The manager's obstinate and surly attitude prevented his staff from befriending him".

My question is regarding the portion in red - Since him is the objective case of pronoun he how can it refer to a possessive noun "manager's". Shouldn't "him" be replaced by "manager"?
rfernandez
Course Students
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:25 am
 

by rfernandez Thu May 15, 2008 5:26 pm

Q 15 Obstinate and surly, the manager's attitude prevented his staff from befriending him.

The rectified sentence as given in the answers is - "The manager's obstinate and surly attitude prevented his staff from befriending him".

My question is regarding the portion in red - Since him is the objective case of pronoun he how can it refer to a possessive noun "manager's". Shouldn't "him" be replaced by "manager"?


Yes, you have spotted an instance of what we call possessive poison. As it appears in your post, "him" may not refer back to "manager's."

When I look at the answer key, though, I see "The manager's obstinate and surly attitude alienated his employees." Here the pronoun "his" correctly refers back to "the manager's." Maybe you have an earlier edition? I'm looking at the 2007 edition, and I don't have the earlier one on hand.

At any rate, your initial point is a good one. Subject and object pronouns may not have possessive nouns as antecedents.

Rey