Does the conclusion escape you? Has understanding the tone of the passage gotten you down? Get help here.
ashish1354
Students
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:07 am
 

MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by ashish1354 Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:13 am

According to the instructions we need to choose between either of the two alternatives as correct or propose another response to correct the sentence.

Stacey would have gone to the party if she knew about it.
if she had known about it.

i could not understand the explanation to the problem that suggests that the sentence as it stands implies that Stacey knew about the party. I feel that the sentences is correct as it stands.

if possible please explain further as i can't catch the author's train of thought.
Ben Ku
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 pm
 

Re: MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by Ben Ku Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:50 am

This is a tricky issue. Most English speakers would probably be able to select the right form without understanding the grammar behind it.

Suppose Robert left my house an hour ago to go to the market. I could say:

If Robert took street A, it would take him 5 minutes to get to the store.
If Robert took street B, it would take him 10 minutes to get to the store.
(If PAST, then CONDITIONAL)
Here, we're discussing the options of possibilities for Robert to get to the store. these are not hypothetical situations, but possible scenarios.

However, when we're talking about hypothetical situations that never happened, we would use a subjective construction.

If Robert had taken street A instead of street B, then he would have gotten there five minutes earlier.
(If PAST PERFECT, then CONDITIONAL PERFECT)

Here, clearly, Robert did NOT take street A, so the entire scenario is hypothetical. You can find this construction on page 113 in the 4th Edition of the Sentence Correction Strategy Guide. (Case 5)

So in your sentence:
Stacey would have gone to the party if she had known about it.
(CONDITIONAL PERFECT, If PAST PERFECT)
is correct since this is a hypothetical situation that never happened.
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
davetzulin
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:56 pm
 

Re: MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by davetzulin Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:20 am

Ben Ku Wrote:This is a tricky issue. Most English speakers would probably be able to select the right form without understanding the grammar behind it.

Suppose Robert left my house an hour ago to go to the market. I could say:

If Robert took street A, it would take him 5 minutes to get to the store.
If Robert took street B, it would take him 10 minutes to get to the store.
(If PAST, then CONDITIONAL)
Here, we're discussing the options of possibilities for Robert to get to the store. these are not hypothetical situations, but possible scenarios.

However, when we're talking about hypothetical situations that never happened, we would use a subjective construction.

If Robert had taken street A instead of street B, then he would have gotten there five minutes earlier.
(If PAST PERFECT, then CONDITIONAL PERFECT)

Here, clearly, Robert did NOT take street A, so the entire scenario is hypothetical. You can find this construction on page 113 in the 4th Edition of the Sentence Correction Strategy Guide. (Case 5)

So in your sentence:
Stacey would have gone to the party if she had known about it.
(CONDITIONAL PERFECT, If PAST PERFECT)
is correct since this is a hypothetical situation that never happened.


i can't seem to find (even outside of the mgmat SC guide) the conditional for you used here:

If Robert took street A, it would take him 5 minutes to get to the store.
If Robert took street B, it would take him 10 minutes to get to the store.

if simple past, would + infinitive

is this a valid conditional construction? what about just using

if present, then present?
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by tim Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:44 am

both of these valid. this is explained in our strategy guide on pages 112 and 113..
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
davetzulin
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:56 pm
 

Re: MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by davetzulin Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:30 pm

tim Wrote:both of these valid. this is explained in our strategy guide on pages 112 and 113..


thanks i got simple past confused with "hypothetical subjunctive"

and you are right, it's right in the guide.

-Dave
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by jnelson0612 Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:22 am

Great, thanks Tim! :-)
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor
cumulonimbus
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:12 pm
 

Re: MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by cumulonimbus Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:54 am

Hi,
I wanted to confirm if my understanding is correct.
As per the MGMAT their are 5 If..then.. constructions.
Out of these only one is hypothetical subjunctive. Hypothetical subjunctive uses simple past form of the verb (except verb to be)
So for the question:
A)Stacey would have gone to the party, if she knew about it.
B)Stacey would have gone to the party, if she had known about it.

Simple past of know is knew. so based on that A should be correct.

Or based on the explanations above I now have to think that hypothetical subjunctive has two cases:
4. in future - something that will never happen, and we are discussing it now - here the 'If' part of sentence has to contain hypothetical subjunctive form of verb (simple past).
5. in past - something that never happened here the format has to be IF past perfect, THEN conditional perfect.

May be I am just repeating what is their in guide. But I still don't understand how to identify hypothetical subjunctive - will word 'would' in the sentence be a sole indicator that hypothetical subjunctive is to be used, or we have to look for meaning as well.
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: MGMAT sc guide- chapter 11 in action problem#3-meaning pg217

by tim Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:23 pm

anytime you start your line of reasoning with "there are 5 of X...", you are approaching verbal questions the wrong way. your goal should be to understand how these sentences work without labeling them or creating lists. beyond that, i can't actually tell whether you have a question that you would like us to help you with..
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html