Does the conclusion escape you? Has understanding the tone of the passage gotten you down? Get help here.
TP
 
 

MGMAT SC: Chap 5 (Modifiers Problem Set)

by TP Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:44 pm

Q. 4: David tried a handful of desserts from the table, which ultimately gave him an upset stomach.

The answer key ->

A. David tried a handful of the table's desserts, which ultimately gave him an upset stomach.

Is it ok to use "that" here instead of which and remove the comma:

David tried a handful of the table's desserts that ultimately gave him an upset stomach?
Guest
 
 

Re: MGMAT SC: Chap 5 (Modifiers Problem Set)

by Guest Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:17 pm

TP Wrote:Q. 4: David tried a handful of desserts from the table, which ultimately gave him an upset stomach.

The answer key ->

A. David tried a handful of the table's desserts, which ultimately gave him an upset stomach.

Is it ok to use "that" here instead of which and remove the comma:

David tried a handful of the table's desserts that ultimately gave him an upset stomach?


Any thoughts on this?
Gmat Delight
 
 

by Gmat Delight Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:00 am

The point in this this questions is that to understand what WHICH modifies and place that noun next to it. In this case that's the desert not the table.
rfernandez
Course Students
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:25 am
 

by rfernandez Sat Aug 09, 2008 3:44 am

Q. 4: David tried a handful of desserts from the table, which ultimately gave him an upset stomach.

The answer key ->

A. David tried a handful of the table's desserts, which ultimately gave him an upset stomach.

Is it ok to use "that" here instead of which and remove the comma:

David tried a handful of the table's desserts that ultimately gave him an upset stomach?


The distinction you're drawing is essential vs. non-essential modifiers. If you use "comma+which," the modifier is additional information that is not necessary to identify the modified noun.

"That" makes it an essential modifier -- that is, the information contained in the modifier is necessary to describe precisely the nouns you mean, perhaps to avoid confusion.

Does the second sentence work? Well, not really. It implies that David actively sought the desserts that would ultimately give him an upset stomach, and that he chose these over choosing desserts that would not give him an upset stomach. Also, David didn't try just a handful of the desserts that would ultimately give him an upset stomach -- he ate all of the desserts that would give him an upset stomach. This sentence clearly conveys a different, nonsensical meaning.