Hi Stacey
I wonder if you can help to figure out what happen to the last score I had onthe GMAT
580 Q( 43), V(27) .
Surprisingly, this score is exactly the same than the first test I took ,
the only difference ( in terms of test ) is the fact that I took the last
in another country.
I said it is a surprise to me since I ve been practicing the MG GMAT study guides and CAT exams and the GMAT Prep.
When I made the first MG CAT I scored 590 Q (38) V( 33)
Realizing that Manhattan Gmat Quantitative questions were "more wordy " than prep software ( MG had at least 5 lines per problem while GMAT Prep 1 or 3 at most ) , so
I swithched to GMAT Prep.
Using GMAT Prep , I scored 720 Q( 50) and V(38)
and day before the real test 730 Q( 50) and V(39)
THe huge difference with GMAT PRep and real test is that at my test I had a lot of wordy questions , many of which required more calculations than reasoning. Though after the test, I thought I would score not lower than 640. Any time I practiced I made AWA, breaks and everything simulating real test conditions,
however I had a meager 580 Q( 43), V(27) .
Could you tell me if it is possible that the gmat algorithm could underscore my performance , just because I could have improve at a non normal pace (the gap between my prior test to the last was just one month ).?????
Or is it that test get harder as many times you take the test ?????
though the preparation I had the last time and the higher scores I have got in simulations, the real test proved the contrary.
In fact, I took a MG TEST ( CAT #2 ) under test conditions ( awa included )
and I got 680 Q (44) , V(38). Compared to the last real test , 580 Q( 43), V(27) I can not understand what could happen . Please , let me know if it could be the case of the algorithm itself.