Hi, I'm sorry I'm only seeing this now (after a week). The forums aren't the place to go when you have an urgent question - for future, do contact our office directly.
I would have told you, first, that I needed a bit more detail on your strengths and weaknesses and, second, not much is going to change in a week. As a general rule, what we score one week out on a practice CAT taken under 100% official conditions is also in the range we should expect on the real test.
Also note: I would have told you to start your own thread - I like to keep each person's "case" separate so that I don't mix up the details from different people. I'll respond here this time, but if you want to discuss further, please start a new thread. You can cut and paste our conversation so far into your first post so that we have everything in "your" thread.
If you had only 4 questions above 3 minutes and those were just a little bit above (within 3m15s?), then that's not too bad. How many times, though, did you make careless mistakes? How many questions did you get wrong in less than about 1m15s each? Which ones of those were problems you did know how to do but made a mistake? (vs. ones that you knew you didn't know how to do, so you gave up quickly)
Doing well on a test like this is all about striking the right balance. It is okay to spend 2.5m on some quant questions because you will have others that you answer in 1.5m. BUT you need to make sure that you aren't making too many careless mistakes on those ones you're answering more quickly - otherwise, spending more time on those harder ones is actually hurting you.
Okay, so I don't know whether you took the test and, if so, what happened - let me know. If you haven't taken it yet or plan to take it again, then go back over the incorrect questions and figure out WHY you got each one wrong. Make a list. These are the major categories:
Careless mistake: I already completely knew how to do this but I messed up somehow. How? Why? Did timing / rushing play into this at all? (If you answered it in less than 1m15s, then you were rushing.)
Didn't recognize what was being tested but I do actually know how to do this - if someone had said, "This question is really about XYZ" then I probably would've gotten it right. In this case, the weakness is that you haven't learned well enough how to do GMAT-format questions, including "translating" GMAT-speak into normal-person-speak so that you can solve.
Skills were weak. I generally knew what the problem was testing but I didn't have the math skills to do the manipulations necessary (either at all or in an reasonable amount of time).
Knowledge was weak. I didn't know what they were testing and, even once I read the explanation, I still felt pretty shaky with it. This one I really should've just gotten wrong and the only issue is to make sure I don't spend too long getting it wrong!
Finally, for your comment on Number Properties. It's important to strive for an "average" level in certain topics but others don't matter at all. The important topics are divisibility & primes, odds and evens, positives and negatives. The not-at-all-important topics are combinatorics and probability.
Okay - so start a new thread and let me know what your current status is. If you didn't take or want to re-take, give me some more details on your strengths and weaknesses so that I can give you more detailed advice. This article will help on number properties:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... -gmatprep/