Machu Picchu S/W CR Question

[KenD75]

From CR book #6, 5th Ed, page 164.

I'd be grateful if someone could please explain why A is a stronger answer than E.

A seems out of scope to me (seems more like anecdotal support, but doesn't add to the linear argument with specific circumstances w.r.t Inca Trail or Machu Picchu).

E seems much more on point, by establishing that the degradation would continue, owed to an even more detrimental # of visitors than when the degradation previously occurred with smaller tourist #s.

Thank you very much for any guidance you're willing to share.

[tim]

Please note that the forum rules indicate you need to include the full text of the problem before we can discuss it, so that other students can benefit from the discussion as well.

[KenD75]

Come on, takes a week to reply to say that?

[tim]

Yes. Please remember this is a free service, and our instructors fit their forum time in among many other responsibilities. You would be much more likely to get a timely response if you followed the forum rules in your first post rather than waiting for us to remind you of the rules and then responding with a post that still doesn't follow the rules.

[RonPurewal]

(and we don't necessarily have access to the books while posting on the forum)