Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
gurvindersingh2004
Students
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:25 am
 

Legislation to reduce Tax benefits

by gurvindersingh2004 Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:01 am

SOURCE: PrincetonReview

The government is considering legislation that would reduce tax benefits for parents opening college savings funds for their children. If passed, the new laws would result in greatly decreased tax benefits for parents who open such accounts. Therefore, if the new laws pass, many college-bound individuals will have difficulty covering their college costs, and some would not be able to attend.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

A. For most college-bound children, their parents’ savings accounts are the only source of educational funding.

B. The legislation is being considered because many parents were misusing savings funds dedicated to their children’s educational costs.

C. College-bound children cannot open savings funds separately from their parents.

D. Because of decreased tax benefits, some parents will not open college savings funds for their children.

E. Parents facing the new restrictions on college funds will find other investments to dedicate to their children’s educational costs.
***********************************************************************OA D****************************************************************************************888888
Could Some expert please help me find out why A is not the correct answer
tim
Course Students
 
Posts: 5665
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 

Re: Legislation to reduce Tax benefits

by tim Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:54 pm

Use the negation technique as described in the assumptions chapter of our CR strategy guide. If an assumption is necessary, negating it should cause the argument to crumble. The negation of A is that savings accounts are NOT the only source of funding. Assuming this does not ruin the conclusion that students will have difficulty covering their costs, so A is not the answer we are looking for..

BTW in case you are wondering how D is the correct answer given this analysis, please note that i am not defending D as an answer - it fails for the same reasons. i think the question is flawed, and that's why you should stick to more reliable sources for practice questions..
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Follow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html
pawar.abhishek
Students
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
 

Re: Legislation to reduce Tax benefits

by pawar.abhishek Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:10 am

Seems like C is the right answer.What is the OA?
jnelson0612
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:57 am
 

Re: Legislation to reduce Tax benefits

by jnelson0612 Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:11 pm

pawar, the stated original answer is D.
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor